Introduction: For today's CSDN record experiment blog post in the review process encountered in the "audit failed" query, through the " dichotomy " to gradually locate the specific words that affect the audit, after modification, the article review in CSDN is completed. . The inexplicable failure of the review comes from a combination of some typos in the input text. The reason for the failure to pass the audit has been verified through testing. If CSDN will review the sensitive words that appear in the review and can give hints in the "Posting Assistant", more troubles may be avoided.

关键词: Moderation , sensitive words , typos , assistant

01 Magical CSDN

1. Background introduction

Recording the experimental results of today's oscillator based on LM7805, what is more puzzling is that many blog posts have not been approved . The reason for clicking on it is "violating community rules".

▲ Figure 1.1 Publishing an unsuccessful blog post

▲ 图1.1 发表未通过的博文

▲ Figure 1.2 The specific reason is a violation of community regulations

▲ 图1.2 具体原因是违反社区规定

So the question is, which part of this experimental blog post violates community rules?

The reason for the test

In order to detect which point in the blog post triggers the "violation of community regulations" in the CSDN article review mechanism , the following can only be checked by the " dichotomy ". That is, keep the first half of the blog post to see if it can be approved. If it doesn't pass, then half of it will be intercepted and released. If it passes, add half of the remaining parts to see if it passes the review. In this way, you can locate the specific language part of the blog post that is involved in the community regulations in the CSDN article review.

1. The first half of the content

Below is the first half of the blog post.
▲ Figure 1.2.1 The content of the first half of the blog post

▲ 图1.2.1 博文前一半的内容

The result of the review was passed.

2. Add another quarter of the content

The third section in the blog post is added to the blog post below and reviewed again. The audit result shows: Failed .

The content of the added paragraph is given below, of which there is only a very simple part. So what part is involved in "violating community rules"? First remove the figure and the following text in this part, and then submit it.

▲ Figure 1.2.2 Added blog post content

▲ 图1.2.2 增加后的博文内容

This time, I finally found the keyword in it. It turned out that there was a typo in the input text, which involved a sensitive part of a person's name.

▲ Figure 1.2.3 gives a “political reminder”

▲ 图1.2.3 给出了“涉政的提示

I think this should be the fault of the sensitive words in it. Now submit again after correcting the typos in the text.

3. Approved

After testing, the blog post passed. Verified the reason for the failure of the audit.

▲ Figure 1.3.1 The full text of the approval

▲ 图1.3.1 审核通过的全文

※ Summary ※

For today's CSDN record experiment blog post in the review process encountered in the "audit failed" query, through the " dichotomy " to gradually locate the specific words that affect the review, after modification, the article review in CSDN is completed. The inexplicable failure of the review comes from a combination of some typos in the input text. The reason for the failure to pass the audit has been verified through testing.

If CSDN can give prompts to the issuing assistant in advance for the problems in the review , it can also reduce a lot of trouble for the author.

● Links to related charts:

Figure 1.1 Publishing a failed blog post
Figure 1.2 The specific reason is a violation of community regulations
Figure 1.2.1 The first half of the blog post
Figure 1.2.2 Added blog post content
Figure 1.2.3 gives a hint of “political
Figure 1.3.1 The full text of the review and approval

Interesting phenomenon in CSDN article review