代写stata编程作业、代写stata语言作业、Empirical Methods in Microeconomics
Problem Set #4 for EC439 – Empirical Methods in Microeconomics
This problem set should be done entirely in Stata.
Please email your .do files to [email protected] before April 18th, 2018. Late
papers will be docked 5x % per day where x is the number of days late (since this is
so close to my grades deadline I really need them in by then). Weekend days count
as days, and the time on the email will count as the time submitted. New days start
at 12:00 midnight.
Include the explanation for each answer as a comment below the code using the /*
COMMENT */ tags in Stata.
For this assignment we’re using the data posted on the blackboard site for the
course. The data is from 2 related papers by Fabian Waldinger and are testing
material from lectures on panel data and fixed effects models.
Both papers look at the expulsion of high profile scientists from Germany by the
Nazis in the early 1930s. Both estimate the effects that this had on the people
remaining in Germany, so both are papers about “peer effects” in productivity.
Dismissals were based entirely on family history, religion and political views and
can be thought of as strictly exogenous.
Data set #1:
We’ll use the following variables in this data:
phduni: university where student graduates year of graduation
phdyear: year of graduation
female: female indicator
foreign: foreign indicator
Outcomes:
ordprof : indicator whether student becomes full professor
publishedtop : indicator whether student publishes dissertation in top journal
lifetimecit: number of lifetime citations of former student
Faculty measures:
avg_quality: average faculty quality measured by citations in top journals
cohort_profs: students per professor (all mathematics students in department)
change_avg_quality measures how much faculty quality changes due to dismissal.
0 for all pre dismissal years and equal to quality change thereafter (remains 0 for
departments without dismissals).
change_cohort_profs : measures how much students per professors change due to
dismissal
phduni331 – phduni3333 a dummy which is equal to 1 for the university that the
PhD student graduated from (if she graduated before 1933) or for the university
that she attended at the beginning of 1933 (if the student graduated after 1933).
Before starting a project it’s good practice to save your control set as a macro so that
your specifications are consistent throughout and your code is transparent. Using
the global command set a control set to include phd year fixed effects, father
occupation fixed effects, the female and foreign variables and the phduni33
variables.
Question 1 (out of 15): For this question use dataset #1, described above.
a) We want to test whether the change in faculty quality induced by the Nazi
dismissals reduced the productivity of those that were not dismissed. First, regress
each of the three outcomes on the change in department quality and our controls.
What can you conclude about productivity spillovers?
b) Explain how this model can be thought of as a difference-in-differences model.
c) What do you think of the standard errors in part (a)? Do you think we should
cluster them and why? If we did cluster standard errors, at what level should we
cluster? What happens if you do this? What does this say about the observations?
Question 2 (out of 15): For this question use dataset #2. We only need 3 variables
for this question:
Lcit50_peersub_avg_ is the peer quality in a persons department
pub_ is the persons productivity as measured by publications
uni_ is the university that the person belongs to
a) Regress the number of publications (pub_) on a measure of peer quality at the
department level (Lcit50_peersub_avg_). Is there a positive effect of peer quality on
output? Can we interpret the relationship as causal?
b) Somebody suggests we manually compute the within estimator (based on uni_).
Manually program the within-effects estimator for them that controls for university
fixed effects. How do the estimates change and why do you think the estimates
change? What words of warning would you give them about either the estimates or
the standard errors that they’ll get using your program?
c) We know there’s a better way. Estimate the same model using the dummy
variable method. Are the estimates different? How about the standard errors? Why
do we see any differences?
2 Bonus points: Fewer than 20 lines of code overall.
http://www.daixie0.com/contents/21/1255.html
The core members of the team mainly include Silicon Valley engineers, BAT front-line engineers, top 5 master and doctoral students in China, and are proficient in German and English! Our main business scope is to do programming assignments, course design and so on.
Our field of direction: window programming, numerical algorithm, AI, artificial intelligence, financial statistics, econometric analysis, big data, network programming, WEB programming, communication programming, game programming, multimedia linux, plug-in programming program, API, image processing, embedded/MCU database programming, console process and thread, network security, assembly language hardware Programming software design engineering standards and regulations. The ghostwriting and ghostwriting programming languages or tools include but are not limited to the following:
C/C++/C# ghostwriting
Java ghostwriting
IT ghostwriting
Python ghostwriting
Tutored programming assignments
Matlab ghostwriting
Haskell ghostwriting
Processing ghostwriting
Building a Linux environment
Rust ghostwriting
Data Structure Assginment
MIPS ghostwriting
Machine Learning homework ghostwriting
Oracle/SQL/PostgreSQL/Pig database ghostwriting/doing/coaching
web development, website development, website work
ASP.NET website development
Finance Insurance Statistics Statistics, Regression, Iteration
Prolog ghostwriting
Computer Computational method
Because professional, so trustworthy. If necessary, please add QQ: 99515681 or email: [email protected]
WeChat: codinghelp