Minsi's incident has come to an end, and I sighed that Minsi did not fall down as expected, fortunately. If Mins were to fall, the impact would be devastating. If Minsi falls, it will affect the confidence of other BSPs, and it will eventually be a terrible hurricane, blowing away the spring and bringing the cold winter.
In the end, Minsi managed people who finalized the investor. I feel that the process is a bit too tortuous. However, I have discussed the incident itself several times. Now I have to think about the problem from a different angle. During the whole incident, whether it is Sina or Hexun, many BSPs are justified. Of extending an olive branch to Minsi bloggers, the number of Minsi bloggers lost is quite large.
This needs to consider the transfer cost of the user after using another product. For a blog, because basically enjoying the service is free, there are three transfer costs in total, past articles, past readers, and past friends.
After the moving service is launched, the blog articles should say that there is no problem, and some moving can even move away with the previous comments, so the previous articles are no longer an obstacle.
Past readers, in fact, after declaring that they have moved, past readers will also follow you one after another, but for those who subscribe with RSS, is there an easier way to bundle the author and the torrent together, such as Authors can modify their own seed information by themselves. Anyone who subscribes will be changed together.
Friends in the past, which existed as groups and circles, are the only transfer costs left now. However, in a circle like Sina, it is difficult to form cohesion. Although everyone is in a circle, they meet each other. No acquaintance, lack of communication and exchange.
So for a BSP, the way to increase its competitiveness is actually very simple, the blog is not afraid of moving, and the user's blog address is still there, if you give enough value (there are a few friends, there are some fixed visits) , it takes a little effort for the blog to update both. Although user-provided content is provided, the user-provided content is not exclusively provided to a BSP, thus causing such a problem. Therefore, BSP can also give users the equivalent value of the effort of "logging in and posting an article", and that's it. Then one day, when the user's content can be exclusive, just grasp these users!
In the end, Minsi managed people who finalized the investor. I feel that the process is a bit too tortuous. However, I have discussed the incident itself several times. Now I have to think about the problem from a different angle. During the whole incident, whether it is Sina or Hexun, many BSPs are justified. Of extending an olive branch to Minsi bloggers, the number of Minsi bloggers lost is quite large.
This needs to consider the transfer cost of the user after using another product. For a blog, because basically enjoying the service is free, there are three transfer costs in total, past articles, past readers, and past friends.
After the moving service is launched, the blog articles should say that there is no problem, and some moving can even move away with the previous comments, so the previous articles are no longer an obstacle.
Past readers, in fact, after declaring that they have moved, past readers will also follow you one after another, but for those who subscribe with RSS, is there an easier way to bundle the author and the torrent together, such as Authors can modify their own seed information by themselves. Anyone who subscribes will be changed together.
Friends in the past, which existed as groups and circles, are the only transfer costs left now. However, in a circle like Sina, it is difficult to form cohesion. Although everyone is in a circle, they meet each other. No acquaintance, lack of communication and exchange.
So for a BSP, the way to increase its competitiveness is actually very simple, the blog is not afraid of moving, and the user's blog address is still there, if you give enough value (there are a few friends, there are some fixed visits) , it takes a little effort for the blog to update both. Although user-provided content is provided, the user-provided content is not exclusively provided to a BSP, thus causing such a problem. Therefore, BSP can also give users the equivalent value of the effort of "logging in and posting an article", and that's it. Then one day, when the user's content can be exclusive, just grasp these users!