bean validation not working with kotlin (JSR 380)

Tommy Schmidt :

so first of all i could not think of a better title for this question so i'm open for changes.

I am trying to validate a bean using the bean validation mechanism (JSR-380) with spring boot.

So i got a controller like this:

@Controller
@RequestMapping("/users")
class UserController {
    @PostMapping
    fun createUser(@Valid user: User, bindingResult: BindingResult): ModelAndView {
        return ModelAndView("someview", "user", user)
    }
}

with this being the User class written in kotlin:

data class User(
    @field:NotEmpty
    var roles: MutableSet<@NotNull Role> = HashSet()
)

and this being the test:

@Test
internal fun shouldNotCreateNewTestWithInvalidParams() {
    mockMvc.perform(post("/users")
        .param("roles", "invalid role"))
        .andExpect(model().attributeHasFieldErrors("user",  "roles[]"))
}

Invalid Roles are mapped to null.

As you can see i want roles to contain at least one item with none of the items being null. However when testing the above code no binding errors are reported if roles contains null values. It does report an error if the set is empty though. I was thinking that this might be an issue with how kotlin code compiles as the same code works just fine when the User class is written in java. Like this:

@Data // just lombok...
public class User {
    @NotEmpty
    private Set<@NotNull Role> roles = new HashSet<>();
}

Same Controller, same test.

After checking the bytecode i noticed that the kotlin version is not including the nested @NotNull annotation (see below).

Java:

private Ljava/util/Set; roles
@Ljavax/validation/constraints/NotEmpty;()
@Ljavax/validation/constraints/NotNull;() : FIELD, 0;
@Ljavax/validation/constraints/NotEmpty;() : FIELD, null

Kotlin:

private Ljava/util/Set; roles
@Ljavax/validation/constraints/NotEmpty;()
@Lorg/jetbrains/annotations/NotNull;() // added because roles is not nullable in kotlin. this does not affect validation

Now the question is why?

Here's a sample project in case you want to try some stuff.

Tommy Schmidt :

Answer

It seems to be an issue with kotlin right now. Refer to KT-27049 for further information.


Workaround

Rafal G. already pointed out that we could use a custom validator as a workaround. So here's some code:

The Annotation:

import javax.validation.Constraint
import javax.validation.Payload
import kotlin.annotation.AnnotationTarget.ANNOTATION_CLASS
import kotlin.annotation.AnnotationTarget.CONSTRUCTOR
import kotlin.annotation.AnnotationTarget.FIELD
import kotlin.annotation.AnnotationTarget.FUNCTION
import kotlin.annotation.AnnotationTarget.TYPE_PARAMETER
import kotlin.annotation.AnnotationTarget.VALUE_PARAMETER
import kotlin.reflect.KClass

@MustBeDocumented
@Constraint(validatedBy = [NoNullElementsValidator::class])
@Target(allowedTargets = [FUNCTION, FIELD, ANNOTATION_CLASS, CONSTRUCTOR, VALUE_PARAMETER, TYPE_PARAMETER])
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.RUNTIME)
annotation class NoNullElements(
    val message: String = "must not contain null elements",
    val groups: Array<KClass<out Any>> = [],
    val payload: Array<KClass<out Payload>> = []
)

The ConstraintValidator:

import javax.validation.ConstraintValidator
import javax.validation.ConstraintValidatorContext

class NoNullElementsValidator : ConstraintValidator<NoNullElements, Collection<Any>> {
    override fun isValid(value: Collection<Any>?, context: ConstraintValidatorContext): Boolean {
        // null values are valid
        if (value == null) {
            return true
        }
        return value.stream().noneMatch { it == null }
    }
}

And finally the updated User class:

data class User(
    @field:NotEmpty
    @field:NoNullElements
    var roles: MutableSet<Role> = HashSet()
)

Altough validation works now, the resulting ConstrainViolation is slightly different. For example the elementType and propertyPath differs as you can see below.

Java:

The Java Version

Kotlin:

The Kotlin Version

Source is available here: https://gitlab.com/darkatra/jsr380-kotlin-issue/tree/workaround

Thanks again for your help Rafal G.

Guess you like

Origin http://43.154.161.224:23101/article/api/json?id=35520&siteId=1