Does the Soth time series database lose its face? Directly copy other people's PPT to finance?

Today, DD saw a very fucking thing, and I must expose it to everyone! Such technical people should be cast aside! I really don't want a face!

Just now, DD saw Tao Jianhui, founder of Taosi Data, complaining on Weibo that someone copied their PPT directly to the past to raise funds

The most ridiculous thing is that even the title, text and icon have not been changed!

Some netizens commented: Mr. Tao, it should not be surprising that you have been in China for a long time .

Such complaints also reveal the current status of the domestic technology circle. Because this kind of news is not the first time.

For a while, cloud service providers were not allowed to abide by the open source agreement to provide commercial services, and for a while, some companies and university professors took open source results to apply for patents and copyrights.

In addition, DD found that the company that directly forked other people's PPT to seek financing did not seem to have a simple background.

It can be known from the public information that the company has won tens of millions of financing last year, and claims to be in aviation, aerospace, China Test Flight Institute, military industry, thermal power generation, petrochemical, intelligent manufacturing and other fields (all key areas ) There are applications.

From Mr. Tao's PPT, I found such a page: Investment Highlights

It is worth noting that the chief consultant Qin Xiaolin , who is he?

According to Baidu Encyclopedia information, Chief Qin is currently the director of the Institute of Data Management and Knowledge Engineering of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the chairman of the China Southern Branch of the Jiusan Society, a counselor of the Jiangsu Provincial Government, and a member of the Standing Committee of the Jiangsu Provincial Political Consultative Conference . His research interests include various database management systems, distributed data management and security, and spatial information processing.

With the blessing of such a high-level person, there is still such a low-level error? What is the meaning behind this? I don't understand it, please share your opinion in the comment area.

Under this Russia-Ukraine conflict, a large number of technology companies have sanctioned Russia, and everyone is aware of the importance of independent research and development. However, why do we not have excellent domestic software? Is it because China's scientific and technological talents are not good enough? Or is the current soil not supporting us to innovate ? This is worth thinking about!

I hope that with the support of the state's policy of supporting independent research and development and encouraging innovation, there will be more doers and fewer speculators ! Stop hurting the real people!

Guess you like

Origin http://43.154.161.224:23101/article/api/json?id=324388897&siteId=291194637