Whenever I do research based on information gathering and empiricism on a certain line, I know that this way of thinking helps me advance my career, but I immediately feel that this way of thinking is setting myself Trap, because it affected my divergent thinking. In fact, divergent thinking is more important than vertical thinking. why?
Vertical thinking will make you confined to monotonous logical lines. This is a dangerous signal. This is why many people are unwilling to advance in one direction, fearing that they will become solidified in the process of diligence. Narrow-minded, this is not without reason.
In fact, if you don't receive enough horizontal information, you will definitely become stupid in the process of diligence and get into a dead end. Many large companies died in this way, and many people were depressed because of the latter half of their lives. Of course, this is inseparable from the problem of productivity, that is, we lack a decentralized economic foundation, lack of a decentralized tool, and everyone's choice is only a vertical life path choice.
Let me give a vivid example to illustrate this danger. "Vertical walking is blind. No one can predict when this road will be broken. The only thing that can be confirmed is that it will break. Even Moore's Law will ultimately yield to the smallest particle size in physics. It may last forever, even if the universe explodes, it will shrink back, and nothing is going straight forward."
"It's like you are walking on a dark road now, with the goal of picking fruits. If you keep going, you will walk faster than others and pick more fruits faster, but You know that there must be a cliff waiting for you in front. But when you choose a decentralized approach, you no longer walk in a straight line, but you don’t know how much fruit you will gain, and your road ahead is not necessarily a cliff. But Only in this way can you have the possibility of living. This is the real dilemma of human society changers.
"To sum it up in one sentence, it is the shortcomings of empiricism itself. Change empiricism to a different scale and to another environment. When you don’t have enough knowledge to support the problems you are facing, you are likely to be wrong and you cannot Realizing that you are wrong, this is the cliff of life. It will let discerning people immediately find out the problem of your ability, and it will make society eliminate you immediately. As you can see, what I am actually talking about is a strategy to avoid stupidity, which is placed in life. Dimension means that people cannot always be in a straight line. They must take into account innovative consciousness and innovative ideas. But more importantly, the strategy in the dimension of things. If the resources of this society are linearly integrated, you can imagine that 90% of the lines will be It is unhealthy to develop into a morbid state. It is like someone saying that the immortality of a large enterprise is hindering social progress. There is such a reason.
"If the whale lives forever, the food in this water area will be consumed by it. If the whale dies, the whale can feed a submarine ecology. What a wonderful thing." So whales cannot live forever, and we can't just be whales, only resources. Decentralization and a greater degree of non-linear aggregation can create an innovative ecology.
So I spent a few years studying the proposition of "how self-organization can improve efficiency". You must know that the universe itself is self-organizing. The universe is by no means multi-threaded. The universe is a random ecology of survival of the fittest. It is different from the processes and rules created by human beings. You must know that every law of science cannot summarize everything. , And human beings improve efficiency by simplifying the rules and making a single process, the final result is that they will definitely be eliminated and replaced by self-organizing ecology. The economic form of our current society as a whole exists, not because such a form can create the greatest value, nor is it that such a form can accommodate the greatest innovation, but the "production line" thinking brought about by the second industrial revolution can be achieved through " "Vertical", "process-based" and "scientific" methods to improve efficiency, create more value than the previous decentralized scattered society! Bigger! (Process-related operations will be the first batch of vocational skills that become useless.) The capital machine is said to be a machine, which is to maximize the adaptation to the production interaction of today's commercial society by setting an orderly organizational form. This logic sometimes fails. For example: the rise of personalization, excess production capacity, excess use value of resources, increasing desire for personal creativity, etc. All consumers in this society, that is, the ultimate reach of production capacity, are ordinary people, and the executive part of this social capital machine is also ordinary people. If the needs of ordinary people change, and the interests of ordinary people and the capital class break, then Change will happen, and all changes in history are caused by this reason. Linearly increase the "production" efficiency by 10 times, but what we need today is the "freedom" of individuality
When we are not from the perspective of producers, when we are not from the perspective of capitalism, and from our own perspective, we can realize that the efficiency improvement brought by technology and the Internet is sufficient from a global perspective. Now that you watch videos, shopping, and socializing are all instantaneous, the producers and capital simultaneously provide diverse content and services. At this time, what we want more is products and services that are more suitable for us, more diverse and more personalized needs. History will not be immutable. If you understand the subtle laws of evolution between people and society that I have described, you can infer the future thoroughly. You can imagine that today’s multi-line parallel world will eventually evolve in the direction of decentralization. When everyone is walking straight in the dark, some people who have eaten enough fruit begin to fear seeking change, and some are still Those who have not stepped into the straight line begin to actively think about how to design a new platform that is more decentralized and can empower individuals.
I used to be such a neurotic, but unfortunately I was too far ahead. If I linger, there will be more young people with this kind of thinking, and they will be smart and think that the post-95 generation is out. This is what I don’t want to see. Yes, because you really can't imagine how good some post-95s are. Now one out of every 10 entrepreneurs is thinking about how to do a decentralized project, which represents this trend.
In fact, to summarize the content of the article, I have just said the following points. The first point: When the production capacity has developed to a certain level, you can no longer look at the problem from the perspective of the ruler. For the overflowing labor force, these talents are the most important perspective, because their “spillover demand” actually reflects the direction of future development.
If we look at the problem from the perspective of the individual, we will find that the individual now always pursues individuality and freedom. From the time when the petty bourgeoisie in Europe first confronted feudal rule, you will find that people are always like this. The ability to build a new social scene is not subject to your vertical and gradual imperial rule. This coincides with the viewpoint above.
The second point: Verticality is just a scientific method of improving production efficiency brought about by the second industrial revolution. This method can indeed improve production efficiency, but you must know that it will also reduce the ability to innovate, and the ability to innovate must be Coming from the public, this is why I very much agree that Marx is right. From the perspective of the future, what Marx said will be fulfilled. It's just that there was no Internet at that time and Marx didn't know how to achieve it, but he also saw through the "material "Great abundance" is the premise. I admire socialism very much. If you look through it, you will understand that it is indeed advanced. I sincerely hope to be the successor to communism.
The third point is what I have been trying to achieve. If multi-line parallelism only improves efficiency but suppresses individualization, it is just a transitional product in the period of productivity improvement, not the "substantial abundance" described by Marx. In the future, what kind of technology and tools should be used to bear the responsibility of realizing the prospect of pre-communism? The new product must not be the current product thinking of "improving efficiency", but a tool for the public to participate in collaborative construction of new scenarios.
With their creativity and adventurous spirit, the new bourgeois nobility of the year worked hard to create a new social scene of overseas colonization and trade. This material richness and adventurous spirit also in turn promoted the development of science and technology and the transformation of social thinking. This is the root cause of the capitalist revolution. Then you compare it to today, what are the "overflowed youths" doing today? They actually have huge creativity to be developed, and they also want to build their own scenes. In a globalized society, when the material is extremely abundant and the opportunity to explore within the earth is lost, today's young people actually hope to have a better ability to allocate social resources. As a member of society, everyone wants to be able to participate In the collaborative construction of society, how will future changes develop? The scene is the most valuable thing in human society. When people build the scene together, all resources and funds will move closer to the scene. This is not a populist thought, but the society has reached the stage of empowering individuals. Think about it. You have the power to set up scenes. Small groups and circles have stronger identity certificates. Instead of living on the wool-cutting platform, all capitals are close together according to the scene. It is such an ecology. No one in this world has ever made a self-organizing system, and no one has a definite design logic. I promise that in this life I will exhaust the physical stamina of a normal person to promote the realization of this product. At this time, I am as confident as 5 years ago. I know this is right. I still don’t know the complexity of this product. Sex, but I will bring him into the public's field of vision, to keep trial and error, to realize it. How many books you have read directly determines whether you can understand what is written above.