This is the last month of my colleagues asked me a question, due to the time he could not answer, but I promised him I would write an article came out to tell him how I think.
In my many years of work, I often encounter something like "do not you use SQL CRUD few things right" customers. Charlie Munger told me, to convince others to resort interests rather than reason. I can not move out of a set of rigorous software engineering theory argue talk to customers, but the combination of his most central point of interests and the best interests of my personal point of balance. Everyone self-starting center point of doing things, some people may be willing to accept change, but some people rather die than surrender. So, what we learn basic theory is not to convince others they are right, more as a risk and earnings criteria. I myself so hard in the practice of self-change, let alone to change others. So do one thing more to achieve a balance between the parties. The more participants, the higher the cost of communication. This is my last article entitled "How I reduce communication cost of the project? "The reason appears.
In fact, far more than the customer, even their leadership can make similar mistakes. Too far past the "account" I do not turn up, in internal discussions among conference last week, I led even the "communication skills" is equivalent project manager of "management." Of course, he may be subject to a variety of contexts associated search words appear. But, he's the awareness is there. All right, the problem is that my boss promotion opportunities, the company also have my existence. In many cases, they find themselves far away and not poetry, but the eyes. Understand others, do not need to go to each individual school survey questions, in-depth understanding of their own to foreigners also said: "People are the same". Understand the problems of other companies, we do not necessarily need to change jobs frequently. The problem excavated their own business, only to find they are fundamentally no chance to change jobs.
Value is generated in the exchange. So, when the market pain points, and that is their chance. A person's strength is too small, need the strength of the team. I am now engaged in IT services, the IT field ability is the power of my core values. I'm not good at project management, I can hire a project manager; I do not understand design, then I can look for a designer collaboration; I do not have so much time to develop, I can find a development engineer and so on. Basic theory in the field of IT service let me know how well other people, I need to understand the principles of computer, I need to understand the software method, I need to understand the project management process, I need to know something about customer psychology. I do understand about each, but it does not mean I have everything themselves. Because I also know some economics knowledge so I can better understand how the division of labor cost reduction and efficiency.
A few days before the interview a candidate graduating from a university we demand 211 posts analyst girls. Among the chat, she told me what analysts think the overall capacity needs require more than the UI designer. In other words, she felt needs more cattle than other jobs, so she wanted to challenge. This girl just graduated, still very young. But Young is not a reason, if no "accident", the girl of this idea will not necessarily change even after 10 years in at least five years. Because this is what I deduced from the difficulty of self-change among the probability of time. This kind of self-centered subjective idea too common, so will my family, my friends will like this, I will lead and clients such, has nothing to do with the qualifications of age, this is a very "normal" phenomenon.
Back on the job, each job is everyone's starting point, the starting point may be different, but the overall capacity needs can not be required because the difference of capacity and negative positions. I am "me is how to reduce communication costs of the project? "Has been emphasized, the division of labor is to break through the limitations of individual ability, to do with a whole stack of people without conflict. I also often hear about the universal programmer Mensao other statements. Seemingly one kind of joke, actually a kind of self-suggestion. Implies more, the views on the brain. Eventually the competitiveness of nothing more than the ability to solve problems. In front of the value exchange, job is so worthless. Do not use "job" to define their own future, it is easy to explore their own limits the value. Many people change jobs more jump in salaries higher, but the value of play space jump talks about narrow. Behind the post is actually you solve the problem, or the ability of certain problems. The width of the line, brother.
我现在的工作更多是专注于如何提高自己和同事的每一行代码的单价，但我不局限于向未来按自己说话分钟收费的方向去努力。我不知道我这篇文字能否回答我同事的那个问题。