The main reasons why college students in the information department must take this degree are as follows:
Educational qualification improvement: By taking a bachelor's degree, you can upgrade your academic qualifications from a junior college to a bachelor's degree, which will make you more competitive in terms of employment and promotion.
Knowledge improvement: Studying at the undergraduate level will be more in-depth and comprehensive than at the junior college level. You will be exposed to more professional knowledge and practical opportunities, thereby improving your personal professional level and abilities.
Broaden employment channels: An undergraduate diploma is more recognized in the job market than a college diploma. It can broaden employment channels and increase employment opportunities.
Increased salary: Graduates with a bachelor's degree usually have a higher salary than college graduates, and taking a bachelor's degree can improve your personal salary.
Increased opportunities for postgraduate entrance exams: If you want to continue your studies, having a bachelor's degree will be more advantageous and can increase your chances of taking postgraduate entrance exams.
Personal development: By taking this degree, you can come into contact with more classmates, teachers, alumni and other resources, which will be of great help to your future career development and network accumulation.
In short, taking a bachelor's degree is an important choice for college students in the information department, which can improve one's academic qualifications, knowledge, employment competitiveness, salary and personal development.
Academic qualifications contempt chain: Group prejudice and identity in the educational context
I. Introduction
In modern society, education plays an extremely important role as an important indicator of individual knowledge and ability. However, as the education system becomes increasingly complex and diversified, the phenomenon of academic qualification devaluation gradually emerges. To put it simply, the chain of contempt for academic qualifications refers to an implicit hierarchy and discrimination phenomenon formed by people with different academic qualifications in employment, social situations and other situations because of their academic qualifications. This article will delve into the connotation, causes and effects of the academic degree contempt chain, and put forward some suggestions to deal with this phenomenon.
2. The connotation of the chain of contempt for academic qualifications
The chain of contempt for academic qualifications mainly manifests itself as a hierarchy based on academic qualifications. In this hierarchy, people with higher degrees are often seen as more knowledgeable and capable, and therefore enjoy higher status in employment, promotions, social interactions, etc. On the contrary, people with low education may suffer discrimination and rejection, and be labeled as "ignorant" and "incompetent".
Specifically, the academic contempt chain can be subdivided into the following levels:
Top universities and ordinary universities: In the eyes of many people, graduates from top universities (such as 985 and 211 engineering colleges) are more popular than graduates from ordinary universities and are more likely to receive preferential treatment and promotion opportunities. This phenomenon exists across the globe, such as the differences between Ivy League schools and other schools.
Graduate vs. Undergraduate: A graduate degree is generally considered a higher level than an undergraduate degree and therefore more competitive in the job market. In some industries and positions, graduate school has almost become a "stepping stone" to entry.
Undergraduate students and junior college students: In the opinion of some people, undergraduate students have more comprehensive knowledge and abilities than junior college students. Therefore, junior college students may encounter certain restrictions and discrimination in the employment and promotion process.
Formal education vs. non-formal education: Graduates from formal education (such as full-time college) tend to be more recognized than graduates from informal education (such as adult education, online education). Graduates of non-formal education may need to put in more effort to prove their abilities during the job search process.
3. Reasons for the contempt for academic qualifications
Uneven distribution of educational resources: There are great differences in educational resources between different regions and different schools. Top universities and schools in urban centers tend to have better teachers, teaching facilities and scientific research conditions, while ordinary universities and schools in remote areas lag behind. This uneven distribution of resources has led to the formation of a chain of contempt for academic qualifications.
Society’s excessive expectations for education: In modern society, education is regarded as an important way to change destiny. Many people believe that only by receiving a better education can they get a better job and life. This excessive expectation leads to discrimination and exclusion between different educational levels.
Selection preferences of employers: In order to save recruitment costs and time, many employers will set certain educational thresholds, such as requiring graduates from 985 and 211 colleges or requiring graduate degrees. This selection preference further aggravates the phenomenon of academic contempt.
Individual self-identity and group bias: Individuals often look for a sense of belonging and identity based on their academic background. Highly educated people may develop a sense of superiority and prejudice against lowly educated people, while lowly educated people may develop awe and discrimination against highly educated people because of their inferiority complex.
4. The influence of academic qualifications contempt chain
Waste of talent: The chain of contempt for academic qualifications may result in some capable but low-educated talents being excluded from employment opportunities, resulting in a waste of talent.
Educational anxiety: The chain of contempt for academic qualifications intensifies the anxiety of families and students about education, which may lead to the excessive pursuit of academic qualifications and the neglect of real ability development.
Social differentiation: The chain of contempt for academic qualifications has intensified social class differentiation, which may lead to deepening estrangements and conflicts between different academic levels.
Blocked innovation: Chains of contempt for academic qualifications may hinder communication and cooperation between people with different educational backgrounds, thus affecting the development of innovation.
5. How to deal with the chain of contempt for academic qualifications
Improve the fair distribution of educational resources: The government and society should work hard to promote the fair distribution of educational resources and reduce differences between regions and schools, thereby improving the overall quality of education.
Change the concept of education: Families, schools and society should change the concept of excessive pursuit of academic qualifications and pay more attention to the all-round development of students and the cultivation of practical abilities.
Diverse selection mechanism: Employers should pay more attention to actual abilities and potential when recruiting, rather than relying solely on academic background to select talents. Establishing a diversified selection mechanism will help break the chain of contempt for academic qualifications.
Strengthen exchanges and cooperation: Exchanges and cooperation between different academic levels should be strengthened to jointly promote the development and progress of society. Through communication and cooperation, mutual understanding and recognition can be enhanced, and prejudice and discrimination can be reduced.
Educational qualifications are a stepping stone
The view that “academic qualifications equals a stepping stone” is widely circulated in modern society. It refers to the fact that in the job search process, academic qualifications often become a key factor in obtaining interview opportunities and job promotions. Here is my take on this perspective:
Educational qualifications as preliminary screening criteria: During the recruitment process, companies usually need to quickly screen out candidates who meet the job requirements. As a relatively objective indicator, academic qualifications can help companies initially judge a candidate's knowledge level and professional abilities. Therefore, academic qualifications have become an important condition for obtaining interview opportunities.
The comprehensive quality behind academic qualifications: An academic qualification is not just a certificate, it represents the comprehensive quality development of an individual in the learning process. For example, independent learning ability, teamwork ability, problem-solving ability, etc. These abilities are critical to success in the workplace, and academic qualifications can, to a certain extent, prove that an individual possesses these qualities.
Educational qualifications are not an absolute measure: Although academic qualifications play an important role in the job search process, they are not an absolute measure of a person's ability and value. Some people without a high degree of education have accumulated rich experience and skills through self-study and practice, and can also stand out in the workplace. Therefore, academic qualifications are only part of the ability, not all of it.
Balance between practical abilities and academic qualifications: Companies should pay attention to the balance between practical abilities and academic qualifications during the recruitment process. Excessive pursuit of academic qualifications may result in missing out on some potential candidates, while excessive neglect of academic qualifications may increase recruitment risks. The ideal situation is to use academic qualifications as a reference during the initial screening stage, and focus more on the candidate's actual abilities and experience in subsequent interviews and assessments.
Lifelong learning and self-improvement: Although academic qualifications are a stepping stone, success in the workplace also requires individuals to have a sense of lifelong learning and self-improvement. In the ever-changing social environment, only by constantly updating your knowledge and skills can you adapt to the challenges of the workplace. Therefore, academic qualifications are only the starting point. Real ability improvement requires continuous efforts and self-development of individuals.
In short, the view that "academic qualifications are equal to a stepping stone" emphasizes the important role of academic qualifications in the job search process, but it does not mean that academic qualifications are an absolute criterion. In actual recruitment, attention should be paid to the balance between practical abilities and academic qualifications, and individuals should be encouraged to continuously improve their value through lifelong learning and self-improvement.
College students that HR looks down upon
Every recruiter hopes to recruit the best talents, but during the recruitment process, sometimes college students are looked down upon.
In fact, college students are not necessarily worse than undergraduates or graduate students. College students may differ in terms of educational background, professional skills and practical experience, but they also have their own advantages. For example, some college students may pay more attention to practice and application, and are better at mastering and applying certain specific skills. In addition, college students may also have stronger adaptability and learning ability, and can adapt to new work environments and task requirements more quickly.
For details, please check: "A client said that when applying for a job, HR ridiculed him for his low academic qualifications. Xiaomi responded: The employee has been fired"< /span>