Introduction: Integrity is a quality that is respected and valued. However, in real life, we often see people with integrity fail to be promoted to leaders in organizations. This article will use two story cases to deeply explore the reasons why people with integrity fail to be promoted to leaders, and reflect on how to find the path to integrity.
Story Case 1: Zhang Ming’s Frustration and Perseverance Zhang Ming is a technical engineer in a large company. He has always been recognized by colleagues and superiors for his integrity, diligence and professionalism. However, when the company needed to select the person in charge of a new project, Zhang Ming did not get the chance. When asked why he was not promoted, his boss said that although he was excellent, he lacked the ability to deal with problems in a complex political environment. In contrast, other candidates are more Machiavellian and interpersonal, making them more suitable for leadership positions.
Story Case 2: Yang Hua’s Hardships and Contradictions Yang Hua is a civil servant who has always been praised for his integrity, probity and high quality awareness. Over the years, he has actively participated in various public welfare activities and has been recognized by the society. However, when he applied for a leadership position, he ran into a dilemma. Facing doubts from the review committee, his integrity and integrity were questioned as to whether he was consistent with the reality of political promotion. Ultimately, he was unsuccessful in his promotion and felt deeply conflicted and disappointed.
Analysis and Thoughts: Why do people with integrity face difficulties in promotions? First of all, people with integrity often feel uncomfortable with maneuvering and political struggles. They pay more attention to fairness and justice and the interests of the team and employees. However, in the real organizational environment, maneuvering and political struggles are inevitable. This puts people with integrity at a disadvantage in the competitive promotion process. Second, people with integrity may lack the ability to self-promote and present themselves. They are usually more modest and low-key, and tend to focus on the work itself, but in a highly competitive workplace, self-promotion and presentation are also important promotion factors.
Additionally, people with integrity may appear hesitant or conservative under the pressure of high-stakes decisions. They pay more attention to moral principles and may be more sensitive to pressures to weigh interests and assume responsibility. In addition, lack of political skills and interpersonal relationship management skills are also one of the reasons why people with integrity fail to be promoted. Leaders need to work with a variety of stakeholders, handle complex interpersonal relationships, and balance various interests. People with integrity can be too forthright and candid and not adept at navigating complex situations in politically sensitive environments.
Conclusion: Integrity is a valuable quality, but people with integrity often face difficulties on their way to leadership. However, that doesn’t mean people with integrity can’t make a difference. In order to realize their value in the organization, people with integrity can rely on communication skills, learn political skills and interpersonal relationship management skills, and flexibly respond to challenges in the organizational environment. In addition, organizations should also recognize the importance of integrity and create a fair promotion mechanism to avoid pitting integrity against promotion opportunities. Only by working together can we find the path to integrity and empower people with integrity to play a greater role in leadership positions.
The preparation materials are shared as follows:
