Link: https://www.zhihu.com/question/551747204
Editor: Deep Learning and Computer Vision
Statement: Only for academic sharing, no infringement or deletion
作者：Bean
https://www.zhihu.com/question/551747204/answer/2680142285
When I look at Introduction, I just look for words such as However, because most authors will emphasize here the limitations of the cutting-edge technology in the field of their paper and how they break through these limitations.
If this is a completely new field, it is the difference between 0 and 1. Even if the work has some local flaws or shortcomings, its innovativeness is unquestionable, and there is a high probability that it will be a top publication, or even CNS. If it is just the difference between 1 and 10, I think it all depends on the communication efforts of the paper. Those with good communication will be published without pressure, and those with poor communication will drift from area 4 to area 1, fooling reviewers and reviewers. The editor-in-chief can also publish good journals, especially those with very solid work. Of course, there is a difference between 10 and 1, that is, this work has no advantage over the latest technology. This kind of paper can also be published. As for where it can be published, it depends on luck and communication.
In addition, when reading literature, you should not just look at the Introduction. The Results part is the core. Whether the experiment is logical, whether the data is complete and solid, whether the device has structural or material innovation, etc. are all the basis for judging the quality of a paper. The significance of reading the Introduction is to determine the problem to be solved by the work.
Author: Zhihu user
https://www.zhihu.com/question/551747204/answer/2783082435
Whether you can tell the level from the intro depends on two aspects: first, your own reading ability, and second, the author's writing ability
If your English level is insufficient, you will not be able to see the logical relationship between the lines of the author's words and the subtleties of using certain words. If it is Chinese, you should be able to have a certain understanding, but in English, it is not necessarily the case. For example, the author uses argument and discuss. Many people don’t know what these two words are used here. What is meant below? If you can’t see it and just think of it as a discussion, then you don’t know the subtlety of the author’s writing. , therefore, you cannot tell the level of the literature from the intro. Another point is that the more logically connected and clearly organized the intro is, the higher the level of literature is. The more complex the better, or the more citations the better. Note that the core of the intro is to let readers know what you are going to do. Rather than just letting people in the industry or your mentor know what you want to do, a high-level intro should also let the layman know what you want to do. As for your subsequent analysis, I found that the layman does not necessarily need to understand, but your intro and Conclusion If layman understands it, then you are a high-level intro.
There is no doubt about the author's writing ability. If it is the mother tongue, we can have a good grasp of the context in which words are used. Of course, there are some people who can't even write Chinese very well, let alone English. When I teach IELTS writing, I often ask students to write a Chinese composition first, which is based on the questions and format of the IELTS test. Many students are a mess. If they can't write Chinese well, what should they do in English? So let students know their composition. The problem is logic, underlying thinking, not rhetoric and language. You can memorize and practice vocabulary and language, but the underlying logical thinking is completely impossible without long-term training. This is also the reason why many IELTS writing cannot be improved in a short period of time. Those crash courses are all a lie. I have said too much, let’s talk about intro. The logic is similar. Even with simple words, you can express the relationship between references and the purpose of writing this article in a clear and concise manner. Of course, there is no need to say it. It is a very good intro.
So if you want to know whether an intro is well written, look not only at the author, but also at yourself.
Of course, a friendly reminder is that when you find a good intro, you might as well copy it, it is very valuable.
Author: Crispy Pig
https://www.zhihu.com/question/551747204/answer/3129805449
Introduction is actually very reflective of level. It depends on whether the author can summarize the development of this field, and finally lead to the problem to be solved in this article, and why this problem is so important and what role it plays in the development of the entire field. You can even mention what difficulties other research groups in this field have encountered in solving this problem and why the method adopted in this article can solve it.
To be honest, when I was reviewing the manuscript, I was very disgusted when I saw random names of people listed in the Introduction: who did what, who did what, who did what. . . This argument makes no sense. What's more, the self-citation rate will explode in this paragraph. . .
Author: Zhang Dahokan
https://www.zhihu.com/question/551747204/answer/2703963626
The question I usually think about when I play games and read novels is, how big is the world view of this game or novel?
The introduction in the article has a similar function, building the world view and historical trend of this task, and releasing the task in a specific context. If you can use the introduction section to explain these three things clearly, it shows that you have an overall view of this field. It is more difficult to describe the history of a large field than a small field; if you can publish specific tasks and explain the source and significance, it means that you have analyzed the bottlenecks that restrict the development of the field. , the specific issues have been sorted out; if you can explain your ideas and advantages in doing the task in a few sentences, it means that you have compared several options. In the limited space, it is not easy to describe these things clearly and smoothly. If it depicts that this article is at a historical turning point and the research conclusions affect the development trend of the field, it is really worth reading.
☆ END ☆
If you see this, it means you like this article, please forward it and like it. Search "uncle_pn" on WeChat. Welcome to add the editor's WeChat "woshicver". A high-quality blog post will be updated in the circle of friends every day.
↓ Scan the QR code to add editor↓
