background
Recently, the students in the group began to write the evaluation report. The conclusions in the report have the following situations:
1. The conclusion is a large block of text, like prose
2. There are multiple data dimensions in the evaluation data results, all the data results are listed in the conclusion, and the main information is not prominent
3. Just list the evaluation data into the conclusion, without inferring the conclusion based on the data
In view of the above-mentioned problems, summarize the following principles for the expression of evaluation conclusions. Hope to help more small partners improve their ability to write evaluation reports.
1. Clearly organized
Writing conclusions into prose is the worst minefield. If you want the conclusions to be organized, you must first classify and summarize the conclusions, and perform "combination of similar items" according to the same points. Then number the summarized categories, and each one has only one conclusion with the same content, so that the conclusions are orderly and short.
If there is a logical relationship between the conclusions, the conclusions need to be written in a logical and progressive manner.
Put the most important conclusions first.
2. Grasp the big and let go of the small, and talk about key issues
If there are too many dimensions in an evaluation, there will be a lot of conclusions derived from the data. At this time, when writing the conclusion, you must be careful not to put all the content in the final conclusion, but to select key issues, have a serious impact, or have a relatively large proportion of the problem and write them in the conclusion. Other minor issues can be included in the data details. together.
The key conclusions are also instructive for the optimization task priorities of product and development students, and the main problems that have a relatively large impact should be solved first.
For example, in the recent evaluation of the text results recommended by Wang Zai, there are more than a dozen reasons for the poor results, but the relatively large proportion is the problem of unsmoothness. In the conclusion, it can be suggested that development should give priority to solving the problem of unsmoothness.
3. Reasonable and evidence-based: conclusions derived from data
The conclusion of the evaluation report is like an argumentative essay written in school, with arguments and arguments. An argument is our conclusion and evidence is the data that supports the argument.
Arguments can generally be summarized from the following dimensions:
1. Whether the evaluation results meet the expectations, if not, what is the gap with the expectations
2. Evaluate the performance of the data and whether the function can be launched
3. What is the comparison between the evaluation results and competing products? Is it better or worse than competing products, or comparable to competing products?
4. The comparison between the evaluation results and the historical version, whether it is better or worse than the historical version, or the results are the same
When expressing the above conclusions, the current data and the amount of difference should be written in the conclusion, so that there are conclusions and data support.
4. Conclusion first
After the final conclusion is sorted out, the conclusion should be placed at the top of the evaluation report. It is convenient for people who read the report to quickly get the most important content.