The company has a technical master who does not work overtime. Boss: Do I really dare not fire you?

In the workplace, many people complain that they work too much overtime. Generally, these employees are relatively average, or the company does not provide enough money and does not have much motivation to work overtime. If you are really a technical tycoon, even if you don’t work overtime, your boss can’t do anything to you. In case you are fired, you are not afraid that there is no company to hire people. Therefore, if you have technology, you have confidence, and only if you have technology can you get a high salary.

I saw such a post on the workplace forum: The boss asked the core employees to work overtime and was rejected: No overtime. Boss: Really I dare not fire you. Netizen: Did you pay 3 times the overtime? What has actually happened?
Insert picture description here
It turns out that this post was sent by the boss of the company. He said that he has a technical tycoon, and he wrote the core part of the company's system, and both the front and back ends. Recently, because the company has a lot of business, the bosses are going to all the programmers to work overtime, including weekends. The other employees had no complaints about overtime, and the weekend came. But this core employee refused.

The boss wanted to dismiss this core employee because he was worried that the technical tycoon’s actions would make other employees dissatisfied, but he was a bit entangled because he was afraid that he would not be able to recruit talented employees.
Insert picture description here
It can be seen from the post that the company should not be paid for overtime work, otherwise the tech tycoon would not refuse to work overtime. So, should the boss fire the employee?

Some netizens say that people with good skills are generally more arrogant, and because they work very efficiently, they don't need to work overtime at all. And employees also have their own personal space, why should they come to the company on weekends? If you fire him, it will only cause the company to lose more, and it will have no effect on this core employee. +++++If you want to learn the front-end, you are confused and have no direction, and you need information, please see my homepage.

Some netizens said that the employee knew that the boss could not do without him at the moment, and that he was inflated. If I were the boss, I would hire someone privately first, and when I hired someone, I would only fire him. This is more reasonable.
Insert picture description here
Some netizens said that this employee probably wanted to leave a long time ago. You can still get compensation if you dismiss him. Why not do it? If it is an occasional one or two overtime, employees will definitely accept it. If it is habitual to work overtime, employees can totally refuse.

Some netizens said that many companies are like this now, and tasks that can be completed within 6 hours during the day must be delayed until night. Either the leader did it to the boss, or there was a problem with the boss’s management style.
Insert picture description here
The editor thinks: Because we only work part-time, most of them consider problems from their own standpoint. In fact, the boss’s worry is not unreasonable. If some employees rely on their own abilities and disobey the boss’s management, how can they manage other employees?

If you were the boss, what would you do? Welcome to write in the comments.

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/ZYDX18984003806/article/details/100990721