I have always thought that the reading questions in Chinese are like fangpi.For
example, an example that is often mocked is:
article: the rain is floating outside the window
Title: the author writes what is the intention of raining outside the window What
is the answer: creating a sad and lonely Atmosphere blablabla ..
The author answers: It ’s really raining outside the window !!
This example is often used to set off the ridiculous and ridiculous language reading questions.
When I grew up, I felt that reading questions still have many advantages,
such as when the author is writing. In the article above that mentioned rain,
maybe his cat overturned the water glass, or his pen suddenly ran out of ink,
but he did n’t write the article, but he compared the rain to the less obvious. The incident was written
so it is because the thing that rains fits the author's thoughts and feelings and
can express what the author wants to express (sad, lonely, etc.)
So from this point of view, the standard answer is indeed desirable, and the author ’s answer can only show that he does not have a thorough understanding of his heart.
The Chinese reading of the college entrance examination requires two abilities. One is familiarity with this set of appreciation systems, and the other is the ability to find information that is needed. This actually requires students to read the article carefully and grasp the details and overall context of the article. Certain training is helpful to the development of students' reading ability. The SAT reading skills are similar. However, the college entrance examination selects some subjective questions instead of all objective questions. It may be based on the rigid requirements of the college entrance examination and the test of the students' expressive ability. The former can be said to be necessary, which can be reflected by the summary of objective question answering skills in various examinations in China. The latter is also useful, as you can see the clarity of a person ’s thinking and the ability to summarize information. This means that just being familiar with the answering formula is not enough for the exam room to solve the problem, and some other skills are also reflected in the test questions.
As for the argument that many people like to limit thinking, I want to say that rules are never fatal restrictions. There are so many rules in ancient poems, and there are still great stories all over the place. The language of the college entrance examination has imposed only a few restrictions for standardization. If an adult or an adult candidate cannot achieve this compromise, how can he be willing to understand other literary appreciation standards and broaden his horizons? Gao Xiaosong said: "Those who claim to be destroyed by the test-oriented education will destroy themselves even if they should not try it."
Another argument that is often overlooked is that it is unfair to rural students if it really investigates Chinese literacy. The reasoning behind this is the same as the eight-legged article. The selection of imperial examinations before the adoption of the eight-legged essay was often carried out by the second generation, especially after the dynasty regime had been consolidated, the so-called class solidification. The fewer objective restrictions on the answer, the more people who read more books stand out-and at the time, access to books was not easy for the poor. Today, the truth is the same. Chinese literacy is to a large extent positively related to the family environment, economic ability and reading volume. Therefore, this feature of the Chinese test questions for the college entrance examination also plays a role in maintaining social stability, although this may not be the vision originally designed.
The Chinese teacher major is just talking about text interpretation recently.
The conclusion is: you can't fully appreciate the beauty of literature if you don't read it in depth, do not analyze the language, but just watch the plot (so touching, so twists and turns, these are nonsense) The artistic secret of literary works lies in the organization of language.
The specific point is: why should the author write this way, if not? (Everyone may think this is not the teacher has been talking about? It's boring. That's because he didn't speak well)
Take three examples:
1. I just mentioned the question "It's raining outside the window". Simply put, without this sentence, the atmosphere of the full text is not as strong. This is not necessarily what the author can realize. Roland Barthes put forward "the death of the author", that is to say, the text has been separated from the writer after being created by the writer, and formed an independent thing, and its "complete" depends on the interpretation of the reader. Therefore, what the reader interprets is not necessarily what the author knows, conveys, and determines.
2. Another example is "Back".
"I was so clever at the time, I always felt that he was not very beautiful, he had to intervene, but he finally settled the price; he sent me to the car. He chose a chair for me by the door; I will The purple fur coat he made for me paved the seats "-" Back "
Do you think you didn't write anything? I said that my father is very concerned about me, what to do for me ...
The detailed analysis (reading comprehension) is as follows:
"He finally settled the price" Why not say "finished", "finished" but "finalized". "Ding" has a certain feeling. First of all, it means that the father and the other party have been grinding for a long time before they are finally determined. It is more difficult than the "finish" and "good" process. And the word "fixed" also reflects that my father must arrange everything for me to be at ease.
Same as "picked" seats below. You directly say "picked" seats will not be over. It must say "set". It means that my father has chosen a seat for me for a long time, and we must choose a good seat before we are finally determined.
But bargaining with people and choosing a seat for half a day, it was very round and silly in the eyes of "I" at that time (just like when my dad kept telling me "to eat and eat". Would n’t you still take care of yourself—just like the author, “I was so smart at the time”) and my father “decided” and “picked up”, just to let the children do n’t worry on the way. The child manages everything well, and fatherly love is reflected in these details.
To reiterate: Zhu Ziqing does not necessarily know the effects of these expressions, but the reader has read, understood, and felt that it is a place worthy of appreciation.
3. The most conscious of me is Lu Xun. The text is very concise and accurate, and he often changes it. Explain that he is aware of the role of written language. Simply put, it is-since he wrote this, there must be his reason.
"Kong Yiji is indeed dead" (It seems that this sentence is very common, or unreadable, but it has deep meaning)
Why "about": because after the last time I saw Kong Yiji, everyone never saw him again, nor Not caring about him, showing apathy.
Why is it true: Under such social conditions, people like Kong Yiji will definitely die.
Summary: When I was in middle school, I did n’t understand why there was such a perverted problem of reading comprehension. Who wants to get it? However, after using the current text interpretation method, from a creative perspective, you will know why the article is well written and why If you can't write it, how to make your article better is the art of text weaving.
reference: