How should we guard against hacker attacks? What are the tough issues?

Despite the importance of investing in effective cybersecurity, many organizations must strike a difficult balance between resources, services, tool costs, and their available budget. Priority is the key, because in most organizations, there is not enough funds to cover all the contents of its security wish list, IT leaders must balance risk and affordability, and nowadays cyber security is facing difficult problems, we should How to prevent hacker attacks?

That's not easy. In the context of competition for attention in many areas, the chief information security officer (CISO) often faces difficult decisions. For example, some organizations want to use advanced threat protection to deal with a large number of recent violations of concern, while for others, application security and testing are a regulatory requirement and are therefore generally not negotiable. The list continues: for example, the growth of BYOD programs has expanded the attack vectors of cybercriminals, and preventing data loss is always a top priority, so it must be considered.

As a result, CISO has a wealth of experience in exploring all options that enable them to achieve their safety goals while simultaneously meeting the available budget. An increasingly popular option is to outsource some or all of the safety functions. By choosing managed security services, organizations can benefit from professional security knowledge while transferring issues related to application deployment, management, and monitoring to trusted third parties.

With the help of Security as a Service (SECaaS), security solutions are no longer delivered locally, and IT departments install virus protection software, spam filtering software, and other security tools on the IT department at each computer or workplace network or server to maintain Update the software security or tell them to use it. The old way of doing things is also expensive; not only are the up-front costs of hardware high, but there are also ongoing costs for projects such as software licenses. In contrast, security as a service allows organizations to use the same tools using only a web browser, making it straightforward and affordable.

SECaaS can include all functions delivered by the cloud, as well as internal security management provided by third parties. The choices range from disaster recovery, business continuity to encryption, network security and intrusion management-the list is endless.

This is a method that can bring a series of potential benefits: it can accelerate the return on security investment, improve security efficiency, and reduce overhead and capital budget. Although providing security as a service is not new to the market, the complexity of the available options and the increasingly favorable "cost of protection" highlight its value to many organizations.

How not to let cyber attacks take you away from the journey of digital transformation

Choose between hosted security services and on-premises

Although managed services may not be suitable for every organization or industry, many of its advocates and users find that managed services can provide enterprise-level security, and the investment required is only a small part of the same solution deployed internally. When considering outsourcing strategies, these benefits can be grouped into a series of areas that usually inform the decision-making process:

flexibility

For some people, concerns about the sensitivity of security reporting data require that their infrastructure must remain on-premises. However, for situations where it is not practical to run software internally but the responsibility for outsourcing is not ideal, a hybrid model has emerged: local hosting of security services. In this way, vendors provide and manage the software used in managed security programs, while customers manage the infrastructure in their own IT environments. All data is kept in the customer's hands, and MSSP is responsible for program management responsibilities. In this way, organizations with IT bandwidth can securely outsource secure operations to their managed service partners. In this process, the upfront capital expenditure can be minimized, and concerns about any type of data leaving the site are eliminated.

Speed ​​time to value

Although the pressure to minimize the time to value is everywhere, deploying new software solutions on-premises is not always that simple. The internal team needs to learn how to use the new software, successfully manage implementation and train colleagues (among many other priorities). In addition, the impact of unexpected delays due to lack of familiarity with the tool may also slow the evaluation value.

However, using a managed security service provider can eliminate the significant setup time and costs associated with deployment. In addition, infrastructure changes can be minimized or completely eliminated, and product experts are responsible for installation, training, and release to all relevant employees. This translates into faster time to implement and realize value.

How the organization maintains its cybersecurity resolution in 2020

Gain professional knowledge

According to Guo Shenghua, a well-known domestic cybersecurity expert: "In the entire cybersecurity industry, even for people with large budgets, the scarce resources are skills and experience. Deployment, management and monitoring of security activities and response to incidents are minimized Damaged security professionals are extremely scarce in every industry, which makes them rare (usually expensive) commodities. However, working with a managed service provider can enable organizations to acquire the expertise specified in each service level agreement. This may be a major advantage, especially for organizations with low budgets who cannot afford their own internal security resources. "

getting Started

The use of managed security service providers is becoming an increasingly popular choice for enterprises and small and medium enterprises. To some extent, the increasing popularity of SECaaS is caused by a shortage of security resources (including qualified information security professionals and entire skills and tools) and an expanding threat landscape.

However, choosing a SECaaS partner requires careful consideration, and based on some variables to determine whether it is the right choice. Organizations with available time, budget, and resources, or with extensive infrastructure, may find that on-premises deployment still makes the most sense. On the other hand, if value is realized faster, IT overhead is reduced, and more security expertise is a priority, then working with a managed service (or hybrid managed service) provider can provide an efficient way to ensure a secure future. (Welcome to reprint and share)

Published 274 original articles · 41 praises · 510,000 views

Guess you like

Origin blog.csdn.net/w3cschools/article/details/105416201